Wokingham District Council - providing local community and service information online
 
Wednesday, 7 January, 2009, 14:22
go: [ Berkshire Health and Safety  /  A - Z Technical Info  /  Q - S  /  Regulation of H&S ]
The Regulation of Health and Safety
What health and safety law requires
 
The basis of British health and safety law is the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The act sets out general duties which employers have towards themselves, their employees and members of the public, and employees have to themselves and each other.
 
These duties are qualified in the Act by the principle of ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’. This means that the degree of risk in a particular workplace or work activity needs to be balanced against the
  • time
  • trouble
  • cost
  • and physical difficulty
of taking measures to avoid or reduce the risk
 
What the law requires is what good management and common sense would lead employers to do anyway, that is, to look at what the risks are and then take sensible (control) measures to tackle them.
 
The The management of health and safety at work regulations 1999 generally make more explicit what employers are required to do under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.  Like the act they apply to all work activities. The main requirements are to:-
 
  1. carry out a risk assessment
  2. make arrangements for implementing the health and safety measures identified as necessary by the risk assessment
  3. appoint competent people to implement the arrangements
  4. set up emergency procedures
  5. provide information and training to employees
  6. co-operate with other employers sharing the same workplace
 
The principle of risk assessment forms the basis for most modern health and safety law in this country.
 
A list of the main regulations which apply generally include:-
- Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992
- Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992
- Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Regulations 1992
- Provision and the Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
- Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992
- Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981
- Health and Safety Information for Employees Regulations 1989
- Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences   Regulations 1995
- Electricity at Work Regulations 1989
- Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (as amended)
- Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Regulations 1969 
In implementing arrangements, the Health and Safety Commission/Executive have 3 main options:
 
1. Guidance
Guidance can be specific to the health and safety problems of an industry or of a particular process in a number of industries. The main purposes of guidance are to interpret the law, to help people comply with the law and to give technical advice. Following guidance is not compulsory and employers are free to take other action. However, following guidance will normally be enough to comply with the law.
 
2. Approved codes of practice (ACoP)
These offer practical examples of good practice and give advice on how to comply with the law. They have a special legal status. If employers are prosecuted for a breach of health and safety law, and it is proved they have not followed the relevant provisions of the ACoP, a court can find them at fault unless they can show that they have complied with the law in some other way.
3. Regulations
Regulations are law, approved by Parliament. Some risks are so great, or the proper control measures so costly, that it would not be appropriate to give employers discretion in deciding what to do about them. Regulations identify these risks and set out specific action that must be taken.
Employment
 
 
Health and safety law is most often concerned with the relationship between employers and employees, which essentially arises out of the ‘contract of employment’ agreed between them. There is no simple test for establishing whether a person is working under a contract of employment or not. In general terms however, the existence of a contract of employment should be gauged by reference to several criteria-:
 
  • whether a person for whom the work is being done controls the way in which the work is done; whether a worker is, in essence, working as part of the other person’s business, integrated into the organisation of the business;
  • whether on the other hand, there are signs that the worker is trading in his/her own right (i.e., as a self-employed person) e.g. whether he/she takes a degree of financial risk, is insured, provides his/her own tools/equipment etc. or provides his/her own assistants
 
Safety duties and responsibilities
 
In the field of health and safety there exists the possibility of criminal and civil liability.
 
Criminal liability arises from the commission of a crime or criminal offence (a breach of a statutory duty). Such statutory duties are to be found in Acts of Parliament (e.g. the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974) or in Regulations etc. which govern standards of health and safety.
 
Civil liability arises from an act or omission which is recognised by the law as giving one individual (or company) the right to pursue a legal claim against another. In the health and safety field this may principally involve either negligence and/or breach of statutory duty. The duty of care required by common law is that a person takes ‘reasonable care’ if he is in a situation where, if he were to fail to take such care, it can be foreseen that somebody else might suffer injury or loss. Negligence can therefore arise out of a positive act or, alternatively, an omission or failure to act.
 
Criminal or civil liability can expose a business to significant financial loss that may threaten its profitability or even its survival.